Kontroversiellt för oss från presidentkandidater?

Här senaste debatt mellan kvarvarande kandidater i kampen om att bli republikanernas presidentkandidat.

Noterade i slutet på debatten svar som förmodligen varit för kontroversiella i Sverige. Frågan "how would your religious beliefs, if you're elected, impact the decisions that you make in the office of the presidency?" ställdes och fick bl a dessa svar:

Newt Gingrich:
"I think anyone who is president is faced with decisions so enormous that they should go to God. They should seek guidance. Because these are decisions beyond the ability of mere mortals to truly decide without some sense of what it is we should be doing.

I would say, second, that we have a real obligation to recognize that, if you're truly faithful, it's not just an hour on Sundays or Saturdays or Fridays. It's in fact something that should suffuse your life, to be a part of who you are. And in that sense, it is inextricably tied in with how you behave.

But I would say, third, one of the reasons I am running is there has been an increasingly aggressive war against religion and in particular against Christianity in this country, largely by a secular elite and the academic news media and judicial areas. And I frankly believe it's important to have some leadership that stands up and says, enough; we are truly guaranteed the right of religious freedom, not religious suppression by the state."

Rick Santorum:
"Faith is a very, very important part of my life, but it's a very, very important part of this country. The foundational documents of our country -- everybody talks about the Constitution, very, very important. But the Constitution is the "how" of America. It's the operator's manual.

The "why" of America, who we are as a people, is in the Declaration of Independence, "We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights."

The Constitution is there to do one thing: protect God-given rights. That's what makes America different than every other country in the world. No other country in the world has its rights -- rights based in God-given rights, not government-given rights.

And so when you say, well, faith has nothing to do with it, faith has everything to do with it. If our president believes that rights come to us from the state, everything government gives you, it can take away. The role of the government is to protect rights that cannot be taken away.

And so the answer to that question is, I believe in faith and reason and approaching the problems of this country but understand where those rights come from, who we are as Americans and the foundational principles by which we have changed the world."

Sedan något helt annat där det kontroversiella var det fetstilta i en del av Santorums svar på frågan "Why do you think you're the best, most qualified person on this stage to beat President Obama?". Först kontrasterar han sig mot sina konkurrenter...
"This is an election about fundamental freedom. It's about who America is going to be. Are we a country that's going to be built great from the bottom up, as our founders intended, or from the top down?

I just think I'm a lot better than the previous two speakers to be able to make that case to the American people. I'm not for a top- down government-run health care system. I wasn't for the Wall Street bailouts like these two gentlemen were.

Governor Romney talks about the private sector and how he's going to bring private sector. When the private sector was in trouble, he voted for government to come in and take over the private sector and be able to -- and to bail them out.

Cap-and-trade -- both of them bought into the global warming hoax, bought into the cap-and-trade, top-down control of our energy and manufacturing sector."


Relaterat i media: SvD, SvD2, DN, DN2, GP SVT
Andra bloggar om: , , , ,

Comments

No responses to “Kontroversiellt för oss från presidentkandidater?”

Skicka en kommentar

Kommentera relevant och undvik invektiv.

Obs! Endast bloggmedlemmar kan kommentera.